A counterargument is simply a perspective that refutes your main argument for those of you unfamiliar with the term. To put it simply, if you’re arguing that technology does more good than damage, the counterargument is technology does more harm than good.
Before we glance at an illustration, you will find a few things I’d prefer to mention: first, we cannot stress essential transitions have been in composing effective counterarguments. It very difficult – if not impossible – to distinguish between which ideas you agree with and which ideas you disagree with without them, your reader will have no way of following your train of thought and will find.
Another important element of good counterarguments may be the concession – that is, the acknowledgement that some components of the opposing argument are legitimate. This is actually the many unknown part of counterarguments for all students – is not your whole point of the counterargument to “disprove” the argument that is opposing?
Finally, yes, the aim is to show why your argument wins away. Having said that, the idea of the concession is always to illustrate that you’ve seriously considered a concern very very carefully, in a nuanced method instead compared to simple black/white, good/bad terms. When presented plainly, this sort of consideration really strengthens your argument.
You need to use this basic template to produce a counterargument:
According to attitude x, _______________________. On one side,
-it holds true that _______________________.
-this claim has many merit because _______________________.
-the declare that _______________________ has some legitimacy.
In the other hand,
-this viewpoint does not consider that _______________________.
-this claim overlooks the truth that _______________________.
Let’s observe this could play away in a test paragraph that works on the example that is personal, those continue to be fine). It does not make use of the template exactly, however it’s pretty close.
Once again, we’re planning to make use of the sample prompt released because of the ACT. For the intended purpose of this workout, we’re just likely to have a look at among the views; wanting to make use of a lot more than that might be too confusing. In reality, you need to generally avoid integrating more than one outside perspective per paragraph, until you are a stellar author who’s currently confident with this sort of back-and-forth.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is generally speaking considered to be a indication of progress, but what is lost once we exchange people with devices? Offered the accelerating variety and existence of smart devices, it really is well well worth examining the implications and definitions of these existence within our everyday lives.
Attitude 1: that which we lose using the replacement of individuals with devices is some right section of our humanity. Also our encounters that are mundane longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for any other individuals.
Thesis: Technology should really be viewed as a force once and for all as it produces brand brand brand new opportunities for folks in addition to an even more society that is prosperous.
1) Topic sentence: introduce your argument (1 phrase)
Within the last few years, brand new kinds of technology have actually developed methods for individuals keep in touch with one another more easily and quickly than ever before.
2) Elaborate on your own argument, and supply a certain instance (2-3 sentences)
From Skype to iphones apps to Facebook, technology erases edges, enabling us to communicate with individuals halfway throughout the world just as if they certainly were in the next space. I’ve actually benefitted extremely because of these technologies: my children immigrated into the united states of america from Asia once I ended up being 6 yrs . old, and in the last ten years, collecting round the computer to speak to my grand-parents and my aunt in Beijing is becoming a ritual that is weekly. Although i’m essay help sorry that people not live across the street for them, even as we did whenever I ended up being little, I am however grateful to help you to see their faces and have them updated from the information on my daily life – a thing that will be impossible without “smart” machines.
3) Introduce outside perspective: 1-2 sentences
Not every person is really excited about the results of the latest technologies, but. Attitude 1 provides a complaint that is typical specifically that the replacement of men and women with devices “causes us to reduce some element of our mankind.”
4) Acknowledge that the perspective isn’t completely incorrect, and explain why (2-3 sentences)
This complaint does have some merit on one hand. Walking across the street or sitting regarding the subway, i will be frequently struck by the number that is sheer of staring glassy-eyed to their phones. They generally are incredibly busy texting which they almost bump into others, showing an obvious not enough courtesy and tolerance (notice just just just how this declaration weaves the standpoint obviously to the writer’s argument) .
5) change back again to your argument and reaffirm it (3-4 sentences)
Having said that, however, the advantages of technology far outweigh an intermittent unpleasant sidewalk encounter – at minimum from my perspeective. As opposed to isolate me personally through the global world(notice exactly exactly just how this declaration indirectly refutes the counterargument) , “smart” technology has offered mainly to facilitate my relationships with other people, never to change them.
Just how to compose the brand new ACT essay, pt. 2: launching and discussing viewpoints that are supporting
After supplying a synopsis associated with brand new ACT essay plus some feasible methods to it in my own past post , i do want to now talk about one that is particular extremely important – skill associated with composing it: including other views into the very own argument for support.
In the event that you’ve ever written an investigation paper, you most likely involve some experience integrating the a few ideas of individuals you accept into the writing. (of course you have actuallyn’t, you’ll get an introduction to performing this in this article.) Having said that, we realize that most schools that are high perhaps perhaps not clearly show pupils to weave supporting quotations, some ideas, etc. fluidly within their writing. The quotes are there any, but they’re often integrated awkwardly in to the bigger argument.
Often, pupils assume because they seem so self-explanatory that they do not really need to spend time introducing or explaining their quotes. They’re here to guide the argument, and then the point of the quotation is obvious…right if the argument is clear? Well, not at all times.
The difficulty is analytical writing requires so much more explanation than might seem necessary. In general, individuals reveal topics with that they are familiar. They are often unaware of the gaps in other people’s understanding because they know a lot of about their topics. Being a total outcome, it just will not happen to them exactly exactly just how explicit they have to be, and so they become unintentionally making away information this is certainly required to understanding their way of thinking.
You must take your reader by the hand, so to speak, and lead them through each step of your thinking process so that they do not get lost when you explain an idea – any idea – in writing. Launching other people’s terms or a few ideas in a way that produces clear the connection betwixt your argument and theirs is just a part that is key of procedure. Otherwise, it is as you’ve missed ahead several actions, making your reader to avoid and attempt assembled the pieces. If there’s one thing you don’t want to do to your audience, it make your ideas’s difficult to follow. That applies to school, the ACT, and just about every other writing you might do for the following sixty or seventy years.
Once more, we’re planning to make use of the sample prompt released because of the ACT.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is generally speaking considered to be a indication of progress, but exactly what is lost as soon as we exchange people with devices? Provided the accelerating variety and existence of smart machines, it really is well worth examining the implications and definitions of these existence inside our everyday lives.
Perspective 1: that which we lose because of the replacement of individuals with machines is some right element of our mankind. Also our encounters that are mundane longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for other individuals.
Perspective 2: devices are great at low skill, repeated, jobs, and also at high rate, excessively accurate jobs. Both in full situations, these are typically much better than humans. This effectiveness contributes to an even more successful and modern world for everyone else.
Perspective 3: Intelligent machines challenge our longstanding notion of exactly what people are and may be. This might be good as it pushes people and devices toward brand new opportunities.