Frontiers of Info Technology& Tremendous Science of Astrology-The place do they match? We all know how significantly IT (Data Technology) has assisted in undertaking calculations for astrology in a few seconds as compared to several hours taken in the previous. This it has lead to distribute of astrology- at minimum the calculations are there with no much work! Now have you wondered how astrology could nevertheless be a science – in spite of some one looking at the chart dependent on lagna, or looking on your chart dependent on moon signal or even sunlight signal?
This is the really reason “scientists” declare it as a fraud and a pseudo science. Which it is NOT. It is dependent on likelihood/likelihood estimate of an function to occur- like would marriage happen in 2009, what is the possibility of the identical? Is it 30%, 60% to far more- there is no Sure/NO solution as we typically give in sciences.
But we do the exact same in quantum physics in marketplace prediction/economics computer software- we chat in phrases of probabilities and likelihood-don’t we? The why is it that astrology is an outcaste? Enable us evaluate this primarily based on two scenario studies.
https://vedicrishi.in/hindi/kundli ) Judgment from a variety of Ascendants- How proper is it?: How can it be correct that astrologers desire lagna fro predictions, and some choose moon signal for predictions and some Navamsa-but nonetheless mainly astrology could be treated in the purview of science. A single of the straightforward ways to resolve this enigma is- that to give fat age to each way of searching at the chart: Lagna = 50%, Moon = thirty%, Navamsa = x% And so forth. So even if an astrologer sees marital conflict due to distinction in view (Saturn currently being there) dependent on Lagna only- nevertheless he is reasonably secure if Moon indication chart/rasi chart give neutral indications. So in essence what an astrologer is undertaking is assigning distinct weights to diverse charts and then drawing a judgment. This is quite significantly accomplished in sciences as effectively- the most of the clever systems just take into account for this, so we can see how present day IT does hook up to astrology. Fuzziness signifies- one are not able to say that Sure or NO, in which Of course=one and NO= . You could have in-amongst price like .4. So if lagan suggests fights on the marital front, but rasi states no- a single could say the likelihood of fights is 50%. That is most of the time you are helpful but there could be situations of intense fights. The depth time body would be predicted primarily based on dasha or transits.
B) Concept of Very good and Poor Astrologer? Have you at any time questioned why there is a notion of great, negative or much better astrologer? Let us discover the exact same? Allow us assess the previously mentioned kundli, exactly where mars maha dasha is ON, active, and permit us see how astrologers of different insights might look at it.
Situation one= Typical Astrologer: Now an regular astrologer would say – Your Mars is averagely placed in Virgo and mars being a all-natural malefic/bad planet, so fights in basic could be there, as it is in 2nd house so troubles in career(2nd house has an indirect bearing on occupation).
Scenario two = Medium astrologer If and astrologer goes deeper, say a far better astrologer, he would further insert worth and say Rahu is in rashi of mars, hence it would give its energy as well: So the reading through could get modified to , fights would be there and would be of unexpected nature(thanks to rahu),troubles in occupation- a lot far more issues in occupation and road blocks- that would be of a sudden nature(Rahu outcomes taken up)
Situation three: Better astrologer: Now a nonetheless far better astrologer would say, that because Rahu will get strength from Saturn in seventh property(3rd full factor), so expect fights, ensuing in coldness, general issues/coldness in job- significantly more issues/hold off in job and obstacles and that also out of the blue( so this way we have integrated the effects of Saturn as well). A single could go on adding far more and more benefit to the readings depending on the astrologer’s understanding/ability foundation. In any of the over cases- is any astrologer lying or not telling the fact? No not really- all are fantastic and could be accommodated, with conclusions offered under.
C) Summary: So we notice as we insert a lot more and more details/knowledge is additional to the prediction the much better the predictions grow to be. Also you can see that none of the earlier mentioned astrologer case 1 to circumstance 3 is Improper. But the some one particular is relatively far better than other individuals. Just like an economist is greater than other- no one can properly predict the markets. Also at the very same time – we can conclude the far more appropriate understanding an astrologer has far better the prediction. So in astrology one particular cannot make Of course or NO assertion, a single can only predict the chances, which matches with the law of karma.
So frontier of IT- the fuzzy methods/quantum computing. Also there is No Yes or NO, they are some exactly where in-in between say of course= one. and No = , but any fuzzy system9Like economy, astrology, sociology) could be .five or .seventy five and so forth.
As we mentioned Astrology is significantly much more intricate than economic programs looking at it primary facie with really intricate and non linear elements in it. So it requirements a lot greater approaches like IT to solve the mystery, than stating it is defunct or makes not “scientific feeling”. So could be a medical doctors may say soon after inspecting a individual tone kind of drugs, but when techniques really sophisticated like astrology are worried – there is certain to be subjectivity.
So could be on astrologer would consider to reinforce the lord of relationship the other world try to do one thing diverse. Also the judgment of the house of marriage would vary some what relying on astrologer’s encounter (examine it intently with financial methods) So does subjectivity suggest it is unscientific? NO.